Export Controls

Export controls have long protected US technology with military applications.  Certain US-origin goods and services require a license before they can be exported or re-exported to certain foreign countries.  US export control laws also restrict “deemed exports,” or the transfer of technology or technical data within the United States to a person who is a non-US national.  Exports are regulated by the US Department of State, under the Arms Export Control Act, and the US Department of Commerce, under the Export Control Reform Act.  New legislation and regulations over the last several years have expanded the reach of export controls, making them also an additional tool for controlling foreign direct investment.  Export controls are not trade actions but do restrict the movement of goods and services.

Arms Export Control Act

The Arms Export Control Act authorizes the President to control the import and the export of defense articles and defense services and to provide foreign policy guidance to persons of the United States involved in the export and import of such articles and services.  The President is authorized to designate which items to consider as defense articles and defense services, which includes hardware that is specifically designed, developed, configured, adapted or modified for a military application, as well as technical data and defense services.  The list of such items is called the United States Munitions List.  The export of these items is prohibited without a license issued by the US State Department.

Export Control Reform Act

The Export Control Reform Act authorizes the President to regulate the export, reexport, and in-country transfer of items that would make a significant contribution to the military potential of any other country or combination of countries which would prove detrimental to the national security of the United States or would further significantly the foreign policy of the United States or to fulfill its declared international obligations.  These items are known as  “dual-use” items—i.e., US-origin civilian products, materials, technology, technical data and software that have potential military applications, and are listed on the Commerce Control List.  The export of these items is prohibited without a license issued by the US Commerce Department.

Application

The legislation has a number of goals:

  • To control the release of items for use in the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction or of conventional weapons; the acquisition of destabilizing numbers or types of conventional weapons; acts of terrorism; military programs that could pose a threat to the security of the United States or its allies; or activities undertaken specifically to cause significant interference with or disruption of critical infrastructure.

  • To preserve the qualitative military superiority of the United States.

  • To strengthen the United States defense industrial base.

  • To carry out the foreign policy of the United States, including the protection of human rights and the promotion of democracy.

  • To carry out obligations and commitments under international agreements and arrangements, including multilateral export control regimes.

Example

The US government has long regulated the export of defense articles and services, as well as “dual-use” US-origin civilian products, materials, technology, technical data and software that have potential military applications. New legislation and regulations over the last several years have expanded that reach to include a focus on “US leadership in the science, technology, engineering, and manufacturing sectors, including foundational technology that is essential to innovation.”

In amending its regulations to implement the Export Control Reform Act, the US Commerce Department is spearheading a process to identify and control the export of emerging and foundational technologies.  Over the last year alone, the US Commerce Department has expanded its restrictions on the export of semiconductor manufacturing equipment and advanced semiconductor chips; launched the Disruptive Technology Strike Force designed to protect US advanced technologies from being illicitly acquired and used by nation state adversaries; continued penalty assessments; and, undertaken multiple enhancements of its voluntary self-disclosure process.  Of particular focus are advanced semiconductors, supercomputing hardware, quantum technologies, hypersonic technologies, military bioscience technologies and advanced aerospace technologies.  

In addition, “critical technologies” have been identified through separate legislation that require approval for foreign investment by the Committee for Foreign Investment in the United States.  In recent years, foreign investments involving critical technologies have comprised more than 60 percent of those reviewed by the Committee.  A specific emphasis has been placed on advanced semiconductors, supercomputing hardware, quantum technologies, hypersonic technologies, military bioscience technologies and advanced aerospace technologies.  

What You Need To Know

  • Penalties for noncompliance are significant.  Criminal penalties for violations of the Arms Export Control Act can include fines up to $1,000,000, imprisonment up to 10 years prison, or both.  Civil penalties can include fines up to $500,000 per violation, as well as seizure and forfeiture of goods and revocation of exporting privileges.  Criminal penalties for violations of the Export Control Reform Act can include fines up to $1,000,000 or five times the value of the export, whichever is greater, and up to 20 years in prison. Civil penalties include fines up to $300,000 per violation or twice the value of the transaction, whichever is greater.  Other penalties include loss of export privileges and fines ranging from $10,000 to $120,000 per violation.

  • New and evolving rules implement the government’s view that export controls should be used to restrict foreign investment in certain situations in addition to just controlling the technology.  Investments in or acquisitions of US businesses that deal in items covered by export controls will face heightened scrutiny as well as separate reviews in many cases. There is no guarantee that an export license for a given product, technology or end-user will be granted. The grounds for control and the identity of the destination country and the end-user will have a significant effect on the likelihood that an export license will be granted.